Learner Expectation: An effective writer
|
|
Superior -- 5 |
Advanced -- 4 |
Proficient -- 3 |
Needs Improvement -- 2 |
Unacceptable -- 1 |
|
Focus/ Purpose
|
Thesis easily identifiable, original, sophisticated, insightful, and well-crafted, showing excellent understanding of purpose and audience. Introduction grabs the reader's attention and eases her/him into what will follow. Conclusion effectively unites ideas. |
Purpose clear. Thesis well-developed. Clear awareness of audience. Strong introduction and conclusion. |
Purpose and thesis present and fairly well developed. Some awareness of audience. Meaningful introduction and conclusion. |
Purpose and thesis vague. Little or no awareness of audience. Basic attempt to introduce and conclude. |
No sign of a thesis or understanding of the paper’s purpose. Little or no attempt to introduce or conclude. |
|
Organization/ Topic Development
|
Organization careful, clear, and logical with effective and engaging transitions. Paragraphs well-crafted with coherent, insightful topic sentences, ideas and details. Purpose constantly identifiable. References text effectively and skillfully when appropriate. |
Organization logical, using strong transitions. Paragraphs well-developed with strong topic sentences and meaningful supporting details and ideas. Purpose regularly identified. References text effectively when appropriate. |
Organization evident, including the use of transitions. Paragraphs fairly well-developed with topic sentences and adequate supporting details and ideas Purpose frequently identified. References text adequately when appropriate. |
Organization unclear and lacks logic. Little use of transitions. Weak topic sentences and few supporting details and ideas. Purpose identified inadequately. References text inadequately. |
Little or no organization, supporting detail and ideas, or identification of purpose. Does not reference text.
|
|
Content/ Accuracy |
Facts and interpretation accurate and insightful. They powerfully support and strengthen the thesis. |
Facts and interpretation accurate and logical. They support and strengthen the thesis. |
Facts and interpretation generally accurate. |
Many inaccuracies in facts and/or interpretations. |
Major inaccuracies in facts and/or interpretations. Limited understanding of the content. |
|
Style/ Expression
|
Word choice/vocabulary rich, stylish and polished. Sentences well-crafted, showing variety, originality, and rich language. |
Word choice/vocabulary strong and effective. Sentences show variety and originality. |
Word choice/vocabulary appropriate. Sentences show some variety and originality. |
Word choice/vocabulary simplistic. Sentences show little variety and originality. |
Weak vocabulary and lack of variety in sentences. |
|
Conventions
|
Excellent sentence structure. No errors in grammar or mechanics (spelling, punctuation, capitalization). |
Strong sentence structure. Few or no errors in grammar and mechanics. |
Good sentence structure, grammar and mechanics. Some errors, but they do not interfere with meaning. |
Errors in sentence structure, grammar and mechanics interfere with the meaning. |
Major problems with sentence structure and grammar. Frequent and considerable errors in mechanics. |
Revised